Vikings: Shields in the Wall - teaser

Hmm. Migration, Diaspora, or Flight for the exploration empire? Mercantile empire is tricky… Hoard, Treasury, Market?

i like that. I’ll have to check out InDesign, too!

The mercantile domains would be Leagues, most notably the Hanseatic League. A bit later than the Viking age, but close enough to forgive.

@timdenee Ooo I quite like Diaspora. It is a little culturally dissonant though. Will consider :smiley:
@Umbra League doesnt quite have the right feel to it but could work. Enterprise perhaps…

1 Like

Speaking of the Hanseatic League, Hanse could work… Or maybe there’s something in the more archaic meaning of guild, like a merchant’s guild. Could go with a slightly archaic spelling like Gilde or Old Norse Gildi, which also evokes gilding and gold, appropriate to enterprising traders.

1 Like

Perhaps Empire for Pioneering Colonists and Company for Enterprising Merchants?

1 Like

@timdenee I’m wary of using words that are out of common parlance, because accessibility is important. Even Dominion for conquerors is on the edge of how obscure id want to be. Having Skald as a playbook at least is specifically Norse, but I’m not 100% sold on it.

@JohnnyC I worry Empire has too many violent overtones and people wont be able to discern it at a glance from Dominion. Company is alright, but I’m feeling Wnterprise might be more fitting :thinking:

Thanks to everyone helping me sort through thoughts on this :slight_smile:

2 Likes

Here’s the starting situation I’ve written for tonight’s playtest:

Swords in the Fjords:
Jarl Ingstad, an aging Jarl, once known for their ferocious might on the battlefield, but now more interested in quietly running their earldom, is awaiting a Trader Caravan at his Settlement. Jarl Borg, a ferocious chieftain, and Ingstad’s neighbour, thinks that the ‘old fool’ has lost their edge, and this caravan is ripe for the picking. Meanwhile, the crafty and ruthless Earl Eriksson, whose land lies north of the other two, believes that the conflict between the two serves as the perfect distraction to conduct a raid on one of their settlements. You can choose to have any one of these 3 be your Jarl, or you may have been contacted by any/all of the above, requesting aid (for a price of course), in either case, choose your mission:
Ingstad: Escort the caravan.
Borg: Raid the caravan.
Eriksson: Raid one of the settlements.

2 Likes

Here are the playbook sheets the group used for the first playtest! The group were so excited with the community and character creation process, interweaving their stories, that we only just got to the mission right at the end, and are meeting again this week to finish the mission, do end-of-mission procedure, and hopefully downtime. I need to write at least a stand in table of entanglements by thursday!

3 Likes

2 Likes

I really, really like the Outsider playbook. Athelstan and Heahmund were/are one of my favorite characters on the show, and I’d kill to play that kind of “caught between worlds” kind of character at the table. Let me know if you’d like a player to test that playbook haha

Also, do you have a blank playbook sheet? I’d love to write a “Vicker” playbook, if that’s not too outside the fiction?

1 Like

@Harrow I’m glad you like it! It seems to work as intended, my player loved playing a scotsman slave. I actually started writing the playbook before i’d even seen Heahmund, based on both athelstan but also Yidu. The only painpoint currently is he forgot about his XP trigger both sessions, so I’m wondering since it is mandatory if I can make space for it in the usual XP area somehow. I never usually forgot when I played blades with vengeful hmmm.

I’m definitely looking to run more playtests, so if you have a group let me know - though beware I am in Australia so timezones can be tricky. Also if you want to organise your own playtest, I’m happy to send the full alpha rules where I’m up to, as long as your group can record the test somehow (voice or full stream preferably, but text and sheets aceptable).

1 Like

Hello ! this looks excellent
First of all sorry for my English, it’s pretty bad.

I’m also working on a hack about Vikings, but it’s dark fantasy in a Low Magic (for humans) Midgard.
It’s a combination of the two things I like the most, Steampunk and Norse mythology.
The system has been working well so far, but we are still testing. The idea is that through a mineral with almost magical properties (bifrost, obvious) the people of Midgard create drakkars that fly (dirigibles are made with dragon skin, obvious) and begin to conquer and enter other realms.

The idea is that in addition to sharing the “Company Sheet” that establishes what kind of group they are and what they are dedicated to, players can establish colonies in the new realms to extract unique resources from there or even have a fleet of Drakkars. All this I have in rules (in Spanish) but we still have to play test this part. As soon as I translate it into English, I upload it.

I’ll keep track of this that looks great!
PD: The game name is Drakkars on the Sky

1 Like

I really like your approach to settlements. I am working with a similar “earned” approach to tier, but using crew goals instead of plots.

From a design perspective, why did you select the number of plots in a decreasing amount per advance? (8 tier 1, 6 tier 2…)

I went the opposite way - faster initial advancement. 2 projects to advance to tier 1, 4 projects to advance to tier 1, 6 to tier 3. My reasoning is that the scale of the increase isn’t linear. Local-regional-national-global influence.

Thoughts?

@Franco_Bianchini that sounds super rad! I haven worked out how colonies will work just yet, I may be a project type for the Crew type dedicated to expansion. I’m defintely trying to lean away from the magical element, so I’m glad that there’s a hack out ere for that!

@ebrunsell

Yeah the numbers are still very early alphatest. My rationale is actually tied to power level and making PCs make hard choices. The options for tier 1 plots are basically the same power level as single crew upgrades from BitD, and I want crews to be able to access most of the generic ones and some of their crew specific ones. As tier goes up, their power goes up, and the crew will have to narrow their focus: do we get the shipyard so we can do higher tier international missions without acquiring a fleet, or do we get access to our 4th dots (like mastery). there will be more options they can’t take.

That said, the roll mechanic will scale in a way that means the hiegher tier content may feel rushed compared to drawn out low tier content… and I’m not sure if that’s a problem? I think probably the most interesting stuff happens at tier 1&2, and 3-finish is mostly wish fulfillment or destruction…

This is tied heavily to my rework of entanglements - they mostly affect or interfere with project development (occasionally even help), and will get more severe with tier, which may curb the creep. Also every Fame shield completed incurs a major event, all bad, kinda like story acts. Fame1 might be a friend betraying you, fame6 is literally an all out invasion of your territory and if you survive you win basically.

1 Like

That makes sense - you might also be able to tie scores to some of the higher tier options. I find it interesting that we are also thinking similarly about entanglements & Fame. My fantasy hack uses Fame & Glory as a combined Rep & Heat / Tier mechanic. The entanglements are the price of fame – generally positive, but often inconvenient.

@MuffinManifesto hows this coming along? sounds amazing. First thing i thought when i played this game was this would make an amazing Viking Age game.

1 Like

I did a second playtest of character creation, which was fun - I’m satisfied all that is working as intended.
Unfortunately actual development time has been on hold because of other projects, but I’m keen to get back to it soon. A lot of what needs doing right now is heaps and heaps of hole-filling. What do the other 3 community types look like, what other projects and missions can they all go on, what are their special ability options etc.

Any updates?